Is the Shark Airwrap Rival Better Than Dyson? Why Beauty Editors Switched
Head-to-head testing reveals distinct mechanical personalities between the two stylers. In testing conducted by six beauty editors at Cosmopolitan, testers noted that while Dyson feels more refined in hand, Shark moves air with noticeably more focused force. Shark dries damp hair roughly 15% to 20% faster during the initial rough-dry stage. For individuals with high hair density or thick, curly textures, this time savings adds up quickly over an ordinary week.
The round blow dryer brush attachment showcases Shark's aggressive styling stance. Dyson's round volumizing brush features soft, flexible bristles designed to minimize tension on delicate hair strands. Shark uses a combination of nylon bristles and firm boar-style tufts that grip coarse strands with high mechanical tension. That physical grip allows users to stretch textured roots silky smooth in two passes, producing bouncy, voluminous 90s-style blowouts that traditionally demanded a separate round brush and heavy ceramic dryer.